BY RABBI YOSEF DOVID ROTHBART
At the Halacha Institute of Toronto, we are privileged to present to Rabbonim real-world shaylos that arise in business, finance, and daily life. These questions are often complex, but through careful analysis, the Rabbonim provide clarity and practical direction. The following cases illustrate some of the halachic challenges that frequently arise in the areas of business and finance.
WHEN “FAIR RIBBIS” IS STILL RIBBIS Questions often arise when well-meaning individuals attempt to create what they view as “fair” arrangements. In one case, a father wished to help his son purchase a home by lending him money for a down payment. To fund this, he borrowed from his own line of credit, intending to charge his son only the amount of interest he himself was paying. He reasoned that since he was not profiting, the arrangement should be permitted.
However, he was advised that this is not so. Even when it appears equitable, charging interest on a loan to a fellow Jew — even to one’s own child, and even when one is just covering his interest payments — is prohibited ribbis. The fact that the parent’s line of credit carried interest does not permit passing that cost along.
NON-COMPETE AND NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS A business owner approached with a concern that his employee might disclose sensitive information and later on end up competing with the business. He asked whether it was possible to create a binding non-compete and non-disclosure agreement.
A non-compete and non-disclosure agreement serves two related purposes. The non-compete section restricts an employee, contractor, or business partner from entering into competition with the company for a defined period and within a defined geographic area after the relationship ends. The non-disclosure section prevents that person from sharing or misusing confidential information, such as trade secrets, client lists, or proprietary methods. Together, these agreements are designed to protect a business’s relationships and sensitive information while ensuring that knowledge gained in one setting is not used to undermine the enterprise.
In secular law, such agreements are common. In halacha, however, a standard kinyan cannot take effect on a promise not to do something (such as not to compete or not to disclose). Without a kinyan, it would be difficult to argue that the agreement is halachically binding.
There is, however, a halachic mechanism that provides a solution. By creating a conditional debt, one can stipulate that if the agreement is upheld, the debt is null and void, but if the agreement is breached, the debt becomes collectible. In this way, the debt serves as an enforceable penalty, ensuring that the agreement is binding in halacha. Care must be taken to draft the terms properly, avoiding issues such as asmachta, but with the correct formula such documents can be structured in a halachically valid way.
GIFTS AND RIBBIS Another question involved the halachic implications of delayed gifts. Six months after his nephew’s bar mitzvah, an uncle finally brought a present. To compensate for the delay, he chose to give a larger gift than he otherwise would have. He explained this to his nephew so no one would question why he received a larger present than his siblings. The explanation concerned his nephew: what about ribbis? In this case, the larger gift is permitted. A nephew is not owed a present; no debt exists. Without a debt, there is no concern of ribbis.
If, however, the uncle had told his nephew to purchase a sefer for $50 with the promise of reimbursement, and later gave him $75 because of the delay, this would be ribbis. In that scenario, a true debt of $50 existed, and adding more due to lateness would constitute prohibited interest.
The Mishnas Ribbis extends this concept to a case where someone lent his grandson money. He explained that he intended to bequeath to all his grandchildren a certain amount of money. However, he will deduct the amount of interest that is usually charged for such a loan from the portion he intended to leave that grandchild. Since the grandfather does not owe anything to his grandchildren, and the grandchild is not required to pay interest to his grandfather, such an agreement is allowed.
RESTRUCTURING LOANS INTO ISKAS Another area of frequent inquiry concerns loans that were not originally structured under a heter iska. In one instance, a man lent money to a friend, drawing from his own line of credit. The loan was intended to be short-term, but it remained unpaid, leaving him responsible for ongoing bank interest. He asked whether it was possible to convert the loan into a one according to the terms of a heter iska to avoid carrying the cost moving forward.
The answer in that situation was that restructuring is possible, but not by simply signing a form or making a declaration. To restructure a loan halachically to be governed by a heter iska, the original loan must first be repaid, and a new loan issued under the proper terms.
This can be accomplished in different ways. If the borrower owns a home or another asset, he can transfer it to the lender through a kinyan to settle the original debt, then repurchase it — thereby creating a new loan governed by a heter iska. Alternatively, if no such asset exists, and the borrower is planning to purchase a business or property, the transaction may be structured in a way that allows it to form the basis for a valid heter iska. Each situation may be different and requires careful halachic guidance, but the mechanisms are available.
KEEP THE CHANGE? While visiting another city, someone bought a small $13 gift. He paid with a $20 bill and received change. Only when he got home and cleaned out his pockets did he realize he was given me too much. Would he now be required to travel back to the store to return the extra change?
According to halacha, money mistakenly given by a storekeeper is treated as a lost object. One is not obligated to travel to the store to return the money to the owner. Instead, he must notify him that he has money belonging to the store, and return the money if and when the owner comes to claim it.
CONCLUSION These are just a few of the halachic dilemmas that arise in the modern marketplace. Contracts, loans, and even everyday acts of kindness must be shaped with both legal and halachic integrity. At the Halacha Institute of Toronto, we address these challenges daily. To read more practical halachic insights like these, follow Yosef Dovid Rothbart and the Halacha Institute of Toronto on LinkedIn, where we regularly post accessible discussions of business, finance, and halacha.
COR, the Kashruth Council of Canada, is one of the world’s largest kosher certification agencies, certifying thousands of products, restaurants, and facilities. Learn more at cor.ca, or read about our certification services at corkosher.com.